The Court of Appeal ruled that Mrs Larner was entitled to be paid for her 2009/10 holidays - although she neither asked to take those holidays during 2009/10 – nor carry forward those holidays to the next holiday year [see para. 96].
The Court of Appeal also said that the facts in the Larner case were different from the facts in the Fraser case, i.e. there was no evidence that Mrs Fraser had been unable to take her holidays [see paras. 46 – 47]. Also see Holidays: use it or lose it.
No comments:
Post a Comment